Punk not dead <a href=" http://jobsfightstigma.com/young-nudist-boys-f876.pdf#unnecessary ">gay boy tube</a> The immediate problem was not about Bashar Assad having chemical weapons, it was about Assad using chemical weapons. We never made possession an issue even after it was clear to the world he had them. The red line was a warning not to use these weapons, which the president argues Assad did, spelling out some of the evidence. But if Billy hits Timmy with a baseball bat, it isn't enough just to take the baseball bat away – at least not in my house. How does giving up the "known" stockpile (if we can even be sure) address the underlying issue of what happened or may? So we say: "now don't do it again or?" Or what? What is or was the goal here?